- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:47:28 -0500
- To: Jiandong Guo <jguo@phaos.com>, merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, "Eastlake <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
This is an edit that is in Don's queue. I expect to see it real-soon-now :) (You might notice that it is in [1], at the bottom, but still not marked done!) [1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/11/last-call-issues.html On Friday 15 February 2002 17:27, Jiandong Guo wrote: > Merlin, > > I raised this question before > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0019.html). > > I suggest to use X9.42 for Diffie-Hellman public keys for two reasons: > > 1. The X9.42 variant of the Diffie-Hellman key is what used in PKIX X509 > certificate. > > 2. From security point of view, PKC#3 is outdated. The security of the > Discrete Logarithm > problem underlying Diffie-Hellman relies not only on the size of the > prime p and the size > of the subgroup generated by the "generator" g in GF(p), but also on the > size of the maximal > prime factor of the order of this subgroup, because of the > Pohlig-Hellman algorithm. > The appearance of the prime number q in X9.42 serves such purpose. > > Jiandong > > merlin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Diffie Hellman part of the spec is somewhat ambiguous at the > > moment: > > > > . It is not clear whether PKCS#3 or X.942 should be used. The reference > > suggests the latter; the public key encoding suggests the former. > > > > . Keying material generation is somewhat ambiguous; the examples > > suggest algorithm first, the language suggests ZZ first; the examples > > suggest the counter is one byte, the language suggests two hexadecimal > > digits. > > > > Any guidance so we can nail down DH interop? > > > > Thanks, Merlin > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >------ Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, > > special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration > > of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any > > virus being passed on. > > > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by > > Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including > > computer viruses. > > http://www.baltimore.com -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 17:48:33 UTC