Re: FW: Re: rsa/oaep

On Thursday 25 April 2002 00:40, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
> Seems to me that we should stick with the current implemented URI for
> the currently implemented algorithm with the current parameters.

This sounds like the best bet to me. What we have does work, and it might 
not be the best format for future parameters but that bridge can be crossed 
when encountered. (A new identifier/namespace and all the parameters 
desired can be proposed.) So I'm going to stick with the text I have now in 
[1] and consider the issue closed unless someone wants to document their 

 $Revision: 1.184 $ on $Date: 2002/04/17 13:17:07 $ GMT

Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 16:16:28 UTC