- From: Tom Gindin <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:36:07 -0400
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: Jiandong Guo <jguo@phaos.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
Joseph:
I was proposing this as a long-term naming convention for the use of
OAEP. I did not propose that we replace the existing URI, merely that we
document that the existing URI is "RSA with OAEP and SHA-1 used for both
the hash algorithm and the MGF".
Tom Gindin
Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> on 04/12/2002 03:28:30 PM
Please respond to reagle@w3.org
To: Tom Gindin/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Jiandong Guo <jguo@phaos.com>
cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: Re: rsa/oaep
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 17:23, Tom Gindin wrote:
> By the way, the proposed URI is legitimate
> under this convention, although it's a simplified case.
I don't think we would simplify the issue by maintaining two URIs (and
complicating it with a SHOULD). Given that there is an opposition to
change, I think we just have to stick with what we have.
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 11:38:44 UTC