- From: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 21:00:17 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>
- Cc: "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>, "Hammond, Ben" <bhammond@rsasecurity.com>
Sure, I believe there can be multiple of EncryptedKey and/or AgreementMethod. They just have to all result in the same key. Donald On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Dournaee, Blake wrote: > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:35:53 -0700 > From: "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com> > To: "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org> > Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, "Hammond, Ben" <bhammond@rsasecurity.com> > Subject: Question about multiple signers > Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:29:15 -0400 (EDT) > Resent-From: xml-encryption@w3.org > > Hello All, > > XML Encryption builds on <ds:KeyInfo> with the addition of <EncryptedKey> > and <AgreementMethod>. > > It is not completely clear from the schema definition or the Candidate > Recommendation if more than one <EncryptedKey> element may > exist inside a <ds:KeyInfo> as used in an <EncryptedData> element. That is, > suppose I am encrypting a piece of data for multiple signers as follows: > > <EncryptedData> > <KeyInfo> > <EncryptedKey Recipient="Sue" > > ... > </EncryptedKey> > > <EncryptedKey Recipient="Bob" > > ... > </EncryptedKey> > > </KeyInfo> > <CipherData> > bla bla > </CipherData> > </EncryptedData> > > > Thanks, > > Blake Dournaee > Toolkit Applications Engineer > RSA Security > > "The only thing I know is that I know nothing" - Socrates > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2002 21:00:19 UTC