- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:02:25 -0400
- To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, hugo@w3.org
At 16:02 7/25/2001, Shivaram Mysore wrote:
>I think it is a wise idea to change our prefix to "xenc" from just "enc" .
>Encoding is more common and most people are familiar with and having just
>"enc"
>for encoding makes sense. but, it looks like we need something like xenc
>(for
>lack of a better alternative)
Ok, now reflected in:
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
$Revision: 1.28 $ on $Date: 2001/07/27 19:43:08 $
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 16:02:27 UTC