- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:02:25 -0400
- To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, hugo@w3.org
At 16:02 7/25/2001, Shivaram Mysore wrote: >I think it is a wise idea to change our prefix to "xenc" from just "enc" . >Encoding is more common and most people are familiar with and having just >"enc" >for encoding makes sense. but, it looks like we need something like xenc >(for >lack of a better alternative) Ok, now reflected in: http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/ $Revision: 1.28 $ on $Date: 2001/07/27 19:43:08 $ -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 16:02:27 UTC