Re: XML 1.1 errata - should it include the "xml-" processing instruction target restriction that is in 1.0 Rev 5?

On 1.12.2016 3:45, bodawei wrote:
> I noticed that the errata for XML 1.0 ( https://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata <https://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata> ) had changed things so the target of a processing instruction may not start with xml-.  Should that detail be added to the 1.1 errata?  https://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-2e-errata <https://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-2e-errata>

IMHO XML 1.1 should be considered dead so there is no need to update errata.

However working group responsible for maintenance of core XML standards
has been disbanded in summer. Liam, is someone at W3C still reading
xml-editor mailing list and is there process for making sure that
someone will respond in the absence of XML Core WG?

    Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
     Professional XML and Web consulting and training services
DocBook/DITA customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------