- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:28:56 -0400
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>
At 12:10 AM +1000 7/24/02, Rick Jelliffe wrote: >Isn't is more like > >[ WF | WF+extras | valid ][ XML 1.1 | XML 1.0 ][ Namespace 1.0 | >Namespace 1.1 ] > >which is only 12 flavours? > This goes straight into XML 1.0 at the lowest level. In fact, it sets something up below the current lowest level (well-formed only). Worrying about variations from other specs like original namespaces and namespaces+errata and namespaces 1.1 and schemas and ... only multiplies the problems. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 14:03:27 UTC