- From: Karl Waclawek <karl@waclawek.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:28:39 -0400
- To: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>
> In terms of error messages it would make much more sense to receive "This > parser does not support version '1.1'" than to receive a strange character > error somewhere near the end of a 10 meg file. If for some reason, you > wanted the 1.0 parser to attempt to parse a 1.1 document, there was already > a system in place to do this-- leave off the <?xml?> decl. You may not have control over that. Also what about documents that are intentionally designed to parse under XML 1.0 *and* 1.1? Why force a choice on the parser? I am not sure a change of this requirement is desirable even for XML 1.1. There is always the possibility to raise an error on the application level, since the parser will report the version. > Of course then > you couldn't specify encoding in the document, but externally it would still > be possible. > > The de facto usage has been to fail on != 1.0. Not with Expat, which is in fairly wide use. Karl
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 10:28:45 UTC