- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:29:50 -0400
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@interlog.com>
- CC: xml-editor@w3.org, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
"Liam R. E. Quin" wrote: > This seems to me to be sensible. > It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though. It has to anyway. > What about XPointer? #id(simon) > You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think. They are definitely allowed. The question is, if one is present, is a parser allowed to ignore it? -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 18:30:17 UTC