- From: Liam R. E. Quin <liamquin@interlog.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
- To: xml-editor@w3.org, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
On Wed, 24 May 2000, John Cowan wrote: > Issue PE28: > > Currently the XML Recommendation is silent about the handling of > documents that contain "impossible" bytes. For example, the byte 0xFF > cannot appear in any UTF-8 encoded document. This seems to me to be sensible. It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though. > Issue PE24: > > Currently, system identifiers may or may not contain fragment identifiers > (the string beginning with "#" at the end of a URI reference). > We are considering changing this language to say that "it is an error" to > use a fragment identifier. What about XPointer? #id(simon) You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think. Lee -- Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto; The barefoot programmer Ankh on irc.sorcery.net, http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ co-author, The XML Specification Guide forthcoming: The Open Source XML Database Toolkit
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 15:41:33 UTC