RE: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?

Hi Jacek,

I'll put this on the next XMLP agenda and will let you know the 
expected timeframe for resolution after that.  

Mike

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ext Jacek Kopecky
>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:02 AM
>To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
>Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
>Subject: Re: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
>
>
>Thank you Noah, I guess a new URI might be preferable.
>
>We (the WS-Desc WG) were concerned about dragging you (the 
>XMLP WG) into a new issue, but I guess it's unavoidable. Can 
>you please give me an estimate of when this particular URI 
>could be coined for us? Before the TP in Cannes would be good. 8-)
>
>Best regards,
>
>Jacek
>
>On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:03 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>> Speaking for myself, I'd prefer to just invent a new URI and 
>have the 
>> XMLP workgroup document it, perhaps in the next update to 
>SOAP.  It's 
>> surely not an incompatible change, and it allows us to keep 
>the URI of 
>> the documentation separate from the URI of that which is 
>being documented.
>> Interestingly, a related discussion is ongoing on www-tag regarding 
>> RDDL natures.
>> 
>> Noah
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Noah Mendelsohn
>> IBM Corporation
>> One Rogers Street
>> Cambridge, MA 02142
>> 1-617-693-4036
>> --------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> Sent by: 
>> xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
>> 01/18/2006 02:33 PM
>>  
>>         To:     xml-dist-app@w3.org
>>         cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>>         Subject:        URI for the concept of SOAP MEP?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dear XMLP WG, 8-)
>> 
>> in WS-Description WG we are working on an RDF mapping for the WSDL 
>> components. The SOAP binding of WSDL points from WSDL operation to a 
>> SOAP MEP to indicate which MEP will be used by the 
>operation. For this 
>> we use the MEP URIs from SOAP 1.2 specification, like 
>> http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/
>> This is a correct and intended use, I believe.
>> 
>> For modeling purposes, we want to say that the WSDL SOAP binding 
>> property soapMEP will point to any SOAP MEP, therefore we need to be 
>> able to indicate the class that represents SOAP MEPs. Currently, we 
>> use http://www.w3.org/2005/10/wsdl-rdf#SOAPMessageExchangePattern
>> for that, but this URI is WSDL-specific and that is wrong.
>> 
>> We intend to use instead the URI that points to the section 3.2 of 
>> SOAP
>> 1.2 specification, which describes the concept of SOAP MEPs:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapmep
>> 
>> Can you please confirm that we may use this URI as the identifier of 
>> the RDFS class of all SOAP MEPs? Or if you don't like this, can you 
>> please provide us with a better URI?
>> 
>> We are asking you because the concept of a SOAP MEP is yours and 
>> therefore you should be the ones to coin the URI to identify that 
>> concept.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jacek Kopecky
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 19:15:55 UTC