- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:01:32 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Thank you Noah, I guess a new URI might be preferable. We (the WS-Desc WG) were concerned about dragging you (the XMLP WG) into a new issue, but I guess it's unavoidable. Can you please give me an estimate of when this particular URI could be coined for us? Before the TP in Cannes would be good. 8-) Best regards, Jacek On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:03 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Speaking for myself, I'd prefer to just invent a new URI and have the XMLP > workgroup document it, perhaps in the next update to SOAP. It's surely > not an incompatible change, and it allows us to keep the URI of the > documentation separate from the URI of that which is being documented. > Interestingly, a related discussion is ongoing on www-tag regarding RDDL > natures. > > Noah > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> > Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org > 01/18/2006 02:33 PM > > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) > Subject: URI for the concept of SOAP MEP? > > > > Dear XMLP WG, 8-) > > in WS-Description WG we are working on an RDF mapping for the WSDL > components. The SOAP binding of WSDL points from WSDL operation to a > SOAP MEP to indicate which MEP will be used by the operation. For this > we use the MEP URIs from SOAP 1.2 specification, like > http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/ > This is a correct and intended use, I believe. > > For modeling purposes, we want to say that the WSDL SOAP binding > property soapMEP will point to any SOAP MEP, therefore we need to be > able to indicate the class that represents SOAP MEPs. Currently, we use > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/wsdl-rdf#SOAPMessageExchangePattern > for that, but this URI is WSDL-specific and that is wrong. > > We intend to use instead the URI that points to the section 3.2 of SOAP > 1.2 specification, which describes the concept of SOAP MEPs: > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapmep > > Can you please confirm that we may use this URI as the identifier of the > RDFS class of all SOAP MEPs? Or if you don't like this, can you please > provide us with a better URI? > > We are asking you because the concept of a SOAP MEP is yours and > therefore you should be the ones to coin the URI to identify that > concept. > > Best regards, > > Jacek Kopecky > > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 18:01:43 UTC