- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:06:49 -0500
- To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- CC: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> As far as I can tell, what we have, or at least what we want to have if > we take this approach is SOAP-independent request-response. That is, > something always goes out, something /always/ comes back, but neither > message need be a SOAP envelope. The optionality is in the SOAPiness, > not in the existence of a response. That rules out true fire and forget, such as SOAP over UDP, right? /r$ -- SOA Appliance Group IBM Application Integration Middleware * This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 21:05:06 UTC