Re: generic MTOM proposal

+1 to both, and my thanks to Mark for his excellent work.

Jean-Jacques.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

[snip]

> For the record, I'm OK with the general Miffy direction, at least as
> something to explore, if that's the will of the group, or I can
> easily live with a SOAP-only solution for now.

[snip]

> I don't see how we can do a proper Miffy refactoring to Last Call
> quality by the F2F.  Even if we could, there would be something to be
> said for gathering comments informally for a week or two, to at least
> get a sense that we have met the concerns of those who wanted a more
> general optimization scheme usable outside of SOAP.