- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:59:14 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 20:05 US/Eastern, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> So yes, C and D are after dumb hops. I thought the promise of PASWA >> was >> supposed to be that the on the wire serialization was transparent ;-). > > And it is! It's only when you want to play funny games with things like > optimisations of signatures that you have to make special allowances ;) > Which could be restated as: it is as long as you're prepared to take the hit of base64 encoding/decoding. Attachments is supposed to be a mechanism to avoid that :-o. Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:59:18 UTC