RE: Issue: Table 17 (Spec part 2, discrepancies

+1 :)

>However, in order to be more verbose about the meaning of this 
>code (like for other response codes).
>I therefore propose a friendly amendment to Henrik's proposal:
>Indicates a problem with either the received HTTP request 
>message or the 
>received SOAP message. This operation SHOULD NOT be repeated with the 
>same message content.
>     Instantiated Property        Value
>     context:FailureReason        "fail:BadRequest"
>If a SOAP message is included in the HTTP response, the local binding 
>instance continues to receive the incomind message. The next state is 
>Otherwise, the message exchange is regarded as having completed 
>unsuccessfully. The next state is "Fail";

Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 13:48:31 UTC