W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Issue: Table 17 (Spec part 2, discrepancies

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:47:32 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D08618367@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

>True, but the description for 500 already says "Indicates that the 
>response message contained in the following HTTP response entity body 
>may contain a SOAP fault." Note the "may". Why bother to change the 
>entry for 400 when the 500 entry already does what we want ?

I think it was in order to get a better mapping between SOAP and HTTP
faults, no?

>If we change the entry for 400, do we also need to do so for 
>any of the 
>other entries in table 17 ? All of them ?

Hmm, I think it would only apply to 400 and 500 codes as these are the
only ones used in the mapping (IIRC).

Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 20:47:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:52 UTC