- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:47:32 -0700
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>True, but the description for 500 already says "Indicates that the >response message contained in the following HTTP response entity body >may contain a SOAP fault." Note the "may". Why bother to change the >entry for 400 when the 500 entry already does what we want ? I think it was in order to get a better mapping between SOAP and HTTP faults, no? >If we change the entry for 400, do we also need to do so for >any of the >other entries in table 17 ? All of them ? Hmm, I think it would only apply to 400 and 500 codes as these are the only ones used in the mapping (IIRC). Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 20:47:55 UTC