- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: 07 September 2002 04:11 > > To: Martin Gudgin > > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Issue 325: XML Schema encoding > > > > > > With some reluctance, I agree with Gudge. > > I'm not quite sure how to take that ;-) > > > My guess is that > > the way to use > > schemas will not be to do the encoding with schemas (because > > encoding is > > for graphs and schemas aren't), > > FWIW - the WS-I Basic Profile group has done some work on describing > graphs in XML Schema This sounds very interesting. Do you have a pointer to that work? There has for some time been a lot of interest in the relationship between W3C XML Schema and graph-oriented representations such as RDF. ( eg. see the schema convergence discussions of '99, which led to http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/NOTE-schema-arch-19991007 ). I'm not suprised to see this crop up again in a SOAP context, and would be very interested to hear more details of the approach you mention. I Google'd for 'WS-I Basic Profile group' but couldn't find any detailed discussions, just the group charters listed at http://www.ws-i.org/Documents.aspx (Maybe the tech discussions are at http://members.ws-i.org/ somewhere?) Thanks for any pointers, Dan -- mailto:danbri@w3.org http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Sunday, 8 September 2002 20:43:30 UTC