- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:48:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: dcrowley@scitegic.com (David Crowley)
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> > But yes, my proposed solution to this issue when I raised it[1] was this; > > > > "1) update the binding framework to state that each binding should > > declare that the authoritative determinant of whether a message is a > > fault or not should be the underlying protocol" > > > > I suppose that is what worries me most! I just don't understand > why the intent of the message lies someplace outside of the SOAP > Envelope. That's the definition of the chameleon view; that the meaning of the message transfer comes from the underlying application protocol. I do agree that this is not how the industry is using it, but it is the only use of SOAP consistent with Web architecture. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 07:43:36 UTC