Re: Email binding issue

Doesn't sound so clear to me...

BTW, thanks Mark, I had never realized before we had an abstract email
binding only.

Jean-Jacques.

Mark Baker wrote:

> >  Hope I'm clear enough,
>
> Those are fair reasons for not doing a SMTP binding, thanks for writing
> them down.
>
> But that leaves us in the predicament that this binding does not serve
> its purpose of exercising the protocol binding framework.  Perhaps we
> should pick another protocol?

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 10:23:16 UTC