Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2

Amy,

Thanks for the correction, I'll try to think faster and type slower next
time ;-)

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: Why XML Infosets are used in SOAP1.2


>
> I'm going to apologize in advance, and then pick a nit ....
>
> Sorry to pick nits ...
>
> On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 15:42, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> > spec[2] refers to the application/xml+soap media type spec[3] which
details
>
> it's always something/something+xml
>
> The +xml is the final bit.  It isn't the subtype.  It's just formatting,
> so 3023 allows you to munge it as just-syntax if that's all you
> understand, by letting you recognize the formatting suffix.  It isn't
> the subtype, because that would imply that the thing after the + was a
> sub-subtype, which IETF would refuse to consider.  As a mnemonic, XML is
> the last thing to apply to a content type (*laugh*  and the meaning of
> the phrase depends entirely on intonation ...).
>
> I'll apologize for picking that nit again, but I've seen it several
> times in the past several weeks, so it might be a worthwhile nit to
> pick.
>
> Amy!
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 06:24:17 UTC