Re: fault/detail

• From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@kestral.com.au>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:04:37 +1000
• To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020718170036.02bb1e38@www.kestral.com.au>

At 16:51 18/7/2002, you wrote:

>Ah, OK. It seemed reasonable that we allow people to put qualified OR
>unqualified elements inside detail.
>
>I take it that you think we should mandate namespace qualification for
>children of detail as we do for children of Header/Body ( re-reading your
>initial e-mail I now realise this is what you said to begin with, sorry for
>the misunderstanding on my part ).
>
>I don't feel strongly either way, I guess you could argue that for the sake
>of consistency we should mandate namespace qualification.

A number of in production services and SOAP libraries do not qualify the
elements in the details. Why make it mandatory - what is the advantage?


Grahame

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 03:14:47 UTC