- From: Martin Gudgin <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:02:05 +0100
- To: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hi Simon, The spec I'm looking at[1] says of the Detail element; A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope Did you mean detail ENTRIES[2] rather then the element itself? Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailelement [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailentry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk> To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:04 AM Subject: fault/detail > > I was going over part 1 and noticed that the spec mandates namespace > qualified children for all the children elements [header, body, etc], > except for the detail element of fault, is there a reason that detail > shouldn't follow suit ? > > Tx > Simon > www.pocketsoap.com >
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 18:02:22 UTC