- From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 17:43:27 -0700
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sorry, yes i meant the child elements of detail. Cheers Simon On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:02:05 +0100, in soap you wrote: >Hi Simon, > >The spec I'm looking at[1] says of the Detail element; > >A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope > >Did you mean detail ENTRIES[2] rather then the element itself? > >Gudge > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailelement >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#faultdetailentry > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk> >To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> >Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:04 AM >Subject: fault/detail > > >> >> I was going over part 1 and noticed that the spec mandates namespace >> qualified children for all the children elements [header, body, etc], >> except for the detail element of fault, is there a reason that detail >> shouldn't follow suit ? >> >> Tx >> Simon >> www.pocketsoap.com >>
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 20:40:23 UTC