RE: RPC Mapping

>OK, but what about the fact that the [in] params 'will be' in 
>the order of the method sig but the [out] params 'SHOULD' be 
>in the order of the method sig?

My feeling is that we don't have to say anything about ordering. In case
we do want to say something, I think it should be in the form of a
non-normative implementation note.

Henrik

Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 12:57:32 UTC