- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:58:49 -0000
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
OK, I think we should raise this as an issue. This has come up because I'm rewriting the RPC section in terms of Infoset. As an editor, I need the WG to tell me which way to go. Gudge ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>; "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:56 PM Subject: RE: RPC Mapping >OK, but what about the fact that the [in] params 'will be' in >the order of the method sig but the [out] params 'SHOULD' be >in the order of the method sig? My feeling is that we don't have to say anything about ordering. In case we do want to say something, I think it should be in the form of a non-normative implementation note. Henrik
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 12:59:49 UTC