Re: RPC Mapping

OK, I think we should raise this as an issue. This has come up because I'm
rewriting the RPC section in terms of Infoset. As an editor, I need the WG
to tell me which way to go.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <>; "XML Protocol Discussion"
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: RPC Mapping

>OK, but what about the fact that the [in] params 'will be' in
>the order of the method sig but the [out] params 'SHOULD' be
>in the order of the method sig?

My feeling is that we don't have to say anything about ordering. In case
we do want to say something, I think it should be in the form of a
non-normative implementation note.


Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 12:59:49 UTC