- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:35:29 -0000
- To: "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
In the editors copy of Part 2[1], section 4.1[2] states of [in] and [in/out] parameters in the request that; 'These appear in the same order as in the procedure or method signature.' For [out] and [in/out] parameters in the response it states; 'The return value accessor SHOULD be first, followed by the accessors for the parameters which SHOULD be in the same order as they appear in the procedure or method signature.' Why the inconsistency? I think we should say the same thing for both request and response. I don't have a *strong* opinion about whether we should enforce order or not, but I'd tend to lean toward lining up the response description with the description of the request. Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.xml#IDAGG5CF
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 10:36:37 UTC