- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 17:30:12 +0100
- To: Max Johnson <max.johnson@dealspark.com>
- CC: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Max, Before we can close the issue and provide the fix, the WG needs to agree on the proposed resolution, so this may take a little more time. BTW, the URI http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding only applies to our December 2001 Working Draft, and will be different in our next WD (probably having 2002 somewhere in the middle). Jean-Jacques. Max Johnson wrote: > Jean-Jacques, > > As of http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding this problem is still present. > If the fix is as easy as it seems (i.e. either make NOTATION an element or > remove it altogether) is it likely that an updated version of the schema can > be issued in the near future? > > Max Johnson > DealSpark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: 05 February 2002 16:11 > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; Max Johnson; Yves Lafon > Subject: Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding > > Paul, > > This issue has been raised already (see attached email), but it > does not appear to be in the issues list. I don't know if we have > updated the schema. > > Jean-Jacques.
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 11:31:44 UTC