- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:40:40 -0000
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com>
- Cc: "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr> To: "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com> Cc: "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding > Max, > > Before we can close the issue and provide the fix, the WG needs to agree on the > proposed resolution, so this may take a little more time. I propose that the resolution is that this is an editorial issue ( in fact, it is an editorial cut-and-paste error, on my part I believe ) Gudge > BTW, the URI > http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding only applies to our December 2001 > Working Draft, and will be different in our next WD (probably having 2002 > somewhere in the middle). > > Jean-Jacques. > > Max Johnson wrote: > > > Jean-Jacques, > > > > As of http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding this problem is still present. > > If the fix is as easy as it seems (i.e. either make NOTATION an element or > > remove it altogether) is it likely that an updated version of the schema can > > be issued in the near future? > > > > Max Johnson > > DealSpark > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] > > Sent: 05 February 2002 16:11 > > To: Paul Cotton > > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; Max Johnson; Yves Lafon > > Subject: Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding > > > > Paul, > > > > This issue has been raised already (see attached email), but it > > does not appear to be in the issues list. I don't know if we have > > updated the schema. > > > > Jean-Jacques. >
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 12:41:49 UTC