- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:26:26 -0000
- To: "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Max, Yes, the schema document will be updated soon, although possibly not the document at[1] Apologies for the delay, it has been on my todo list for a while, but I've not got round to it Regards Martin Gudgin [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com> To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>; "Paul Cotton" <pcotton@microsoft.com> Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding > Jean-Jacques, > > As of http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding this problem is still present. > If the fix is as easy as it seems (i.e. either make NOTATION an element or > remove it altogether) is it likely that an updated version of the schema can > be issued in the near future? > > Max Johnson > DealSpark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: 05 February 2002 16:11 > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; Max Johnson; Yves Lafon > Subject: Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding > > > Paul, > > This issue has been raised already (see attached email), but it > does not appear to be in the issues list. I don't know if we have > updated the schema. > > Jean-Jacques. >
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 11:27:34 UTC