- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:46:36 -0500
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
- Cc: "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com>, <www-ws@w3.org>
> I would very much appreciate if anyone can tell me how anomalies such as this one are resolved and the likely timeframe for a fix to be applied? I am forwarding your question to the technical email list for the W3C XML Protocol WG who is responsible for the Schema you are writing about. I am sure we should get a WG response to you in less than a week and hopefully in a few days. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> -----Original Message----- From: Max Johnson [mailto:max.johnson@dealspark.com] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:31 AM To: www-ws@w3.org Subject: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding The SOAP serialization rules defined in http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding appear to have a bogus attribute: <xs:attribute name="NOTATION" type="tns:NOTATION"/> <xs:complexType name="NOTATION"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:NOTATION"> <xs:attributeGroup ref="tns:commonAttributes"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> As the W3C's XML Schema Recommendation specifies that attributes must be simple types the above would seem to be invalid. I assume the intention was that NOTATION be an element? I would very much appreciate if anyone can tell me how anomalies such as this one are resolved and the likely timeframe for a fix to be applied? Regards Max Johnson DealSpark
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 19:47:23 UTC