- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:18:36 -0800
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:40:51PM -0500, Mark Baker wrote: > > > Here SOAP messages would be directly seen as representations of the state of > > the resource referenced by the request URI (or its subordinates). Here one > > essentially views SOAP as syntax for representing resource state. This > > really feels like HTTP with SOAP as the syntax for entity bodies. > > Right. I have to disagree with MarkN's response to this; any 2xx > response to a POST includes a representation of a resource (even 204). > It's just that the resource is so transient that there's no point > providing a URI for it in most cases (and if there is, we can use 3xx > to redirect to it). Oops; that was poorly put on my part, and that's a good way to say it, Mark. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 19:18:37 UTC