RE: Problem with resolution of Issue 221

My strong feeling is that intermediaries should not be required to do PI 
checking in situations where performance makes such detection a problem. I 
agree with Gudge that requiring it for one purpose but not another misses 
the point.  So, if the resolution to 221 seems inconsistent when viewed 
from that perspective, then I think we need to get the WG to clarify.  My 
recollection was that our intention was that detection and rejection in a 
receiver was to be on a best effort basis, but I could be wrong.  Thanks.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 17:57:59 UTC