- From: <w3.ruellan@laposte.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "xml-dist-app" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Dear all, In its current state, Part 2 of the specification is not coherent about the context:FailureReason property. In 6.1 [1], this property is defined as being an URI In 6.2 [2] and 6.3 [3], it has values such as "receptionFailure". In 7.5.2 [4], it has values such as "fail:receptionFailure". Two solutions exist to render the specification coherent: <proposal_1> context:FailureReason is a QName. It has values such as "fail:receptionFailure". </proposal_1> Pros: concise. Cons: can we use QName outside an XML document/XML infoset? <proposal_2> context:FailureReason is a URI. It has values such as: http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/mep/FailureReasons#receptionFailure. </proposal_2> Pros: we use URIs. Cons: more verbose. Regards, Hervé. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#meppropconv [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#singlereqrespmep [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#soapresmep [4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#http-bindrespnode Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,13 €/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)"
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 14:37:07 UTC