- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:00:09 -0700
- To: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Just a quick comment regarding your note: Note: I have a concern with Henrik's suggestion that "A binding [binding specification?...NRM] may define a set of properties." [4] In my opinion, the properties are defined by our specification (for core functions) and by the specifications for various modules (e.g. security) and message patterns. This is a very fundamental distinction. I believe this is supported in the model that I propose through nesting. People who want to expose the same properties can do so by either nest or use properties defined by other parties. I don't think there is any need for a general interface model. Henrik
Received on Friday, 17 August 2001 11:02:01 UTC