Re: DR8xx - message path model

Lucas,

This section has been lifted from the charter - we cannot change it. It's
currently there for reference only.


On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:11:19AM -0500, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> > There is nothing in XP intermediaries that prevents you from sending
> > symmetrical messages in either direction.
> 
> That was hard to pick up from the draft, so I will change this to a point about
> language.
> 
> Regarding 3.4:
> "intermediaries cannot be implicitly defined but must be an explicit part of the
> message path model for any data encapsulation language."
> 
> This is murky about whether message paths themselves need to be explicit.  This
> wording may be more clear:
> "Support for intermediaries in a message path must be directly addressed within
> the specification."
> 
> _________
> Lucas Gonze
> WorldOS Corporation
> 109 Ainslie Street
> Brooklyn, NY 11211
> lucas@worldos.com
> www.worldos.com
> 

-- 
Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA)

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 17:51:54 UTC