- From: MOREAU Jean-Jacques <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:37:47 +0100
- To: Lucas Gonze <lucas@worldos.com>
- CC: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Lucas Gonze wrote: > Regarding 3.4: > "intermediaries cannot be implicitly defined but must be an explicit part of the > message path model for any data encapsulation language." > > This is murky about whether message paths themselves need to be explicit. This > wording may be more clear: > "Support for intermediaries in a message path must be directly addressed within > the specification." Lucas, thanks for your text, I think it's clearer; but we are once again hitting this same issue: the text was taken directly from the charter, and we are strongly encouraged NOT to change the charter! David, this seems like an improvement, it would be a pity to loose it; is there anything we can do about it? Jean-Jacques.
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2000 04:41:07 UTC