RE: DR604

> I think the easy fix is to add the word 'content' to the end of 
> DR604. Which
> becomes:

A valid and valuable addition, I agree.

> In terms of what intermediaries can touch and what 
> transformations they can
> perform on the semantics of an interaction... its not clear to me that we
> have established any stated requirements - eg. do say request/response
> interactions fully nest through a bunch of intermediaries or is it a
> hop-by-hop chain of request/response pairs; what can an intermediary that
> signs a message touch... but thats for a different section...

This is a nice area which we will have to dive into - we must be able to
control the intermediaries in exactly what they can do with messages. 
I think this area will be looked at when dealing with the concept of 
intermediaries and with extension profiles, so there should be no need of
an explicit requirement

  cheers
   --oh

--
ohurley at iona dot com
+353 1 637 2639 

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 15:56:20 UTC