- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:19:02 -0400
- To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>
getting back to this... Alan Kent wrote: > Fixing up Format/structure is > the real thing I really care about. I think we all like changing the three existing Format/structure values to Comparison values. But why do we need to introduce 'words' and 'complete value' as new Format/structure values? Is it because moving these three out leaves Format/structure empty and we feel compelled to have a non-empty set? (I don't feel so compelled; note that Format/structure is optional in the architecture document). If the comparison is 'all words', 'any words', or 'adjacent words' then a structure of 'words' is implied, and the Format/structure value is redundant. Is there another case where we need Format/structure? --Ray
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 12:19:03 UTC