- From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:02:33 +0100
- To: rden@loc.gov
- CC: www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:39:29 -0400 > From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov> > > We had an extensive discussion of this on the SRW listserv, I think > we agreed that this is a flaw that should be corrected, a proposal > was suggested (to forward to the ZIG, that allWords, anyWords and > adjacentWords be made Comparison attributes), and then we got > distracted, dropped the ball, and no proposal came out. > > I'm soon going to open up the SRW listserv (including the archive) > to public access, so you can see the discussion. > > I need to study your proposal more carefully because on the surface > it seems you want these to be Expansion/interpretation and we > thought they should be Comparison. In any case, I agree we should > correct this. Hi Ray, I think the boundaries between Expansion/interpretation and Comparison have always been rather fuzzy. To my mind it doesn't matter too much which of these baskets gets to hold allWords and friends; the important issue is the addition of the new Format/Structure attributes for Complete Value and Word. _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "int error = 0; error = 1; if (error != 0) ..." -- sample code in Microsoft C Reference Guide. -- Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2003 00:57:59 UTC