- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:28:29 +0100 (BST)
- To: Theo van Veen <Theo.vanVeen@kb.nl>
- cc: www-zig@w3.org
> I was assuming there was a lot of overlap but the way you describe it,
> there does not have to be an interoperabilty problem. However, with CQL
> in mind, I still would prefer that, when DC-Lib records are indexed, the
> DC-Lib names can be used as access points.
-Then- there's an interop problem as you can search author with both the
DC-Lib name and the appropriate BIB2 access point.
I would argue against this, particular as 'when DC-Lib records are
indexed' is essentially meaningless in Z39.50. I could take DC-Lib
transform it into MARC, index the MARC, and then retransform it on the way
out back to DC-Lib.
Rob not-the-list-owner-just-vocal Sanderson
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk)
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 11:34:29 UTC