- From: Giannetti, Fabio <Fabio_Giannetti@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:00:11 +0100
- To: "'www-xsl-fo@w3c.org'" <www-xsl-fo@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F024AE847@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
Hi Dariusch, you can ctually change the static parts of the page from a page to another, I send you the "trick" version that resolve your problem. The not tricky one can be resolved using the XSL-T part. When you generate the letters you can select the first block of text (the one under the address) and apply a style with the space-before and all the others without it .... Embedding a block-container inside a block doesn't resolve your problem because the absolute positioned stuff are treated like outside the flow (FOP issue an error ...) so it will be calculated from the beginning of the referred area container and it will not be counted (as vertical and horizontal dimension) in the flow .... Fabio > -----Original Message----- > From: Dariusch Bagheri [mailto:Dariusch.Bagheri@gwi-ag.com] > Sent: 10 October 2001 16:35 > To: 'www-xsl-fo@w3c.org' > Subject: AW: stacking > > > Hi Fabio, > > I tried this possibility too. But the header will be repeated > on every page > (see attachment). Static content is repeated on every page in a > page-sequence element, this conforms to the specs. > Anyhow, i would prefer a 'clean' solution without any tricks. > This is an > every day problem in formatting and to solve it should be > (relative) easy. > > Meanwhile i reread the specs and found that blocks generate > block-areas > while block-containers do not, they generate viewport/reference ports. > Stacking rules apply only to block-areas. > > What do you think about the idea "block-container in a block" > (even though > fop cannot cope with this)? Then those blocks could be > properly stacked. > > regards > dariusch >
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: stacking2.pdf
- application/octet-stream attachment: stacking2.fo
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 12:00:44 UTC