- From: Dariusch Bagheri <Dariusch.Bagheri@gwi-ag.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:57:44 +0200
- To: "'www-xsl-fo@w3c.org'" <www-xsl-fo@w3c.org>
Hi Fabio, your solution works perfectly! And i do not think that it is too tricky. Thank you!! regards dariusch > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Giannetti, Fabio [mailto:Fabio_Giannetti@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2001 18:00 > An: 'www-xsl-fo@w3c.org' > Betreff: RE: stacking > > > Hi Dariusch, > you can ctually change the static parts of the page > from a page to > another, I send you the "trick" version that resolve your problem. > The not tricky one can be resolved using the XSL-T part. When > you generate > the letters you can select the first block of text (the one under the > address) and apply a style with the space-before and all the > others without > it .... > Embedding a block-container inside a block doesn't resolve > your problem > because the absolute positioned stuff are treated like > outside the flow (FOP > issue an error ...) so it will be calculated from the beginning of the > referred area container and it will not be counted (as vertical and > horizontal dimension) in the flow .... > > > Fabio > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dariusch Bagheri [mailto:Dariusch.Bagheri@gwi-ag.com] > > Sent: 10 October 2001 16:35 > > To: 'www-xsl-fo@w3c.org' > > Subject: AW: stacking > > > > > > Hi Fabio, > > > > I tried this possibility too. But the header will be repeated > > on every page > > (see attachment). Static content is repeated on every page in a > > page-sequence element, this conforms to the specs. > > Anyhow, i would prefer a 'clean' solution without any tricks. > > This is an > > every day problem in formatting and to solve it should be > > (relative) easy. > > > > Meanwhile i reread the specs and found that blocks generate > > block-areas > > while block-containers do not, they generate > viewport/reference ports. > > Stacking rules apply only to block-areas. > > > > What do you think about the idea "block-container in a block" > > (even though > > fop cannot cope with this)? Then those blocks could be > > properly stacked. > > > > regards > > dariusch > > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 03:56:37 UTC