- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:38:42 -0400
- To: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>
- CC: Bill Han <bill.han@oracle.com>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > I'd second that. Here is what XPointer Framework spec says: > > "If the namespace binding context contains no corresponding prefix, or > if the (namespace name, LocalPart) pair does not correspond to a scheme > name supported by the XPointer processor, the pointer part is skipped." > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/#scheme I confess that seems correct to me now too. In other words, the test case may well be wrong. Does anyone see a reason why this test should have a fatal error? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2005 16:38:51 UTC