- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:16:59 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
>That would not be an error. XInclude does not define the semantics for ><p>, neither should it prejudge the semantics of <p>'s children, nor >restrict them in any fashion. > OK, that's weird but at least it's consistent. I'm not sure if I like it or not. For now I'm neutral. This should probably be called out explicitly in the spec; i.e. say that this is OK. Otherwise people will get this wrong. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 10:40:52 UTC