- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:52:42 -0800
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
That would not be an error. XInclude does not define the semantics for <p>, neither should it prejudge the semantics of <p>'s children, nor restrict them in any fashion. > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:23 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: RE: Non-defined elements in XInclude namespace > > At 4:19 PM -0800 1/10/03, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > >The [children] property of the xi:include element information item may > >include a single xi:fallback element; the appearance of more than one > >xi:fallback elemenr, an xi:include element, or any other element from > >the XInclude namespace is a fatal error. ..." > > > > OK, so what if there's an XInclude element that's a grandchild or > deeper of an xi:include element in a non fallback element? e.g. > > <xi:include ...> > <p> > <xi:include .../> > </p> > </xi:include> > -- > > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) | > | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava | > | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | > | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 12:53:14 UTC