- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:23:58 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Summary: Inappropriate use of MAY in 2.4.1.1
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
In 2.4.1.1 we read "No ·user-defined· datatype MAY have anyAtomicType as its
·base type·"
The RFC2119 "MAY" is always permissive. We should not use RFC markup for an
occurrence of "may" that is imposing a constraint.
Suggest: "A ·user-defined· datatype MUST NOT have anyAtomicType as its ·base
type·"
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 17:24:00 UTC