- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:23:58 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Summary: Inappropriate use of MAY in 2.4.1.1 Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com In 2.4.1.1 we read "No ·user-defined· datatype MAY have anyAtomicType as its ·base type·" The RFC2119 "MAY" is always permissive. We should not use RFC markup for an occurrence of "may" that is imposing a constraint. Suggest: "A ·user-defined· datatype MUST NOT have anyAtomicType as its ·base type·" -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 17:24:00 UTC