- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:22:43 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |davep@iit.edu
--- Comment #3 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2010-11-18 00:22:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> My reading of "No X may have a Y" is "There must not be an X that has a Y" -
> that is, it is a prescriptive statement, not a permissive one.
That's the way I read it, too. And I agree that RFC2119 prefers "MUST NOT" to
"MAY not", even if they technically mean the same thing. (But since they mean
the same thing, it's truly a minor editorial fix.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 00:22:44 UTC