- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:28:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11336 Summary: Permitted usage of xs:anyAtomicType Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com We don't allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from xs:anyAtomicType. But we do allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from union(xs:anyAtomicType, xs:integer), or even from union(xs:anyAtomicType) (a singleton union), which appears to have exactly the same semantics. This seems inconsistent... I cannot see any reason for allowing xs:anyAtomicType (or xs:anySimpleType) to appear as a member type of a union or as an item type of a list. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 17:28:08 UTC