- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:28:07 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11336
Summary: Permitted usage of xs:anyAtomicType
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
We don't allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from
xs:anyAtomicType.
But we do allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from
union(xs:anyAtomicType, xs:integer), or even from union(xs:anyAtomicType) (a
singleton union), which appears to have exactly the same semantics.
This seems inconsistent...
I cannot see any reason for allowing xs:anyAtomicType (or xs:anySimpleType) to
appear as a member type of a union or as an item type of a list.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 17:28:08 UTC