- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:57:14 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6021 --- Comment #4 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2008-10-20 17:57:14 --- Wondering whether we can get away by saying roughly: "Whenever a schema document S=source is overridden by O=override, then any <include> or <import> to S are as if they were to O, unless the <include> or <import> was meant for a namespace different from that of O (think chameleon include/override). If S is overridden by multiple documents, then use any one of them as O." This way: - It's still at the syntax level, so the rule is deterministic. (We had difficulties specifying redefinition rules at the component level.) - It helps solve many more use cases than the current rule, in particular, if A includes B, B can still be overridden. (The pervasiveness.) (The current rule will most likely make this case invalid.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 17:57:24 UTC